YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL BECAUSE OF YOUR POSESSIONS...
-Banguirimu quote
I figure this quote can be quite controversial within itself. In society of today we must admit, beauty is seen first or catergorized by the outside appearance. The shoes, the hair, the complexion, the way the outfit is put together etc...dont lie, you all have done it! And then from then on, just maybe will the insider persona seep out to the person of interest? To some, yes, to others...nope! That is because folks these days are just way too vain for mankind...again, you must agree, we are all guilty of it, do not lie to yourself. For example, if a male approaches a female and he is not her "physical type" right away, she will most likely find a way [hopefully politely] to turn him down, vice versa for the males...but that is ok, it is part of our human nature to need to be attracted to the opposite sex. However, the problem arises when we mistake being attracted to the outward appearance, which like the quote refers to as their possessions as "beautiful." No no no...maybe sexy, cute, handsome, spicey whatever it is you say, but beautiful, I just feel should be reserved for the inner being!
Our possessions are our hair, our eyebrows, the lipstick we buy from mac, the six-pack stomach guys have after drinking that powdery stuff to help them lift weights. Our possessions become the clothes we spend book money on, the shoes that cover our bare feet and even the slang we borrow from our fellow surroundings. When appealing to the opposite sex, then that becomes beauty, but that is alllllll wrong my dear readers. Yes beauty lies in the eye of the beholder but it also lies within.
--WHY DO WE FIND THAT TODAY ONLY THOSE WHO OWN THOSE POSSESSIONS ARE CONSIDERED EVERYTHING IN THE BOOK {pretty, beautiful, hot etc} & THOSE WHO DO NOT [yet marvelous within] FALL SHORT. AM I RIGHT WHEN I SAY, A PERSON CANNOT LOOK BEAUTIFUL FROM FIRST GLANCE WITHOUT SUCH POSSESSIONS?!
what is UR VOICE????
10.09.2009
QUOTE/CONTROVERSEY OF THE WK
Posted by Poetically-Inclined at 12:49 PM
Labels: CONTROVERSY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment